9 Comments

The mass production of inferior grade products can get extinct for all I care.

I'd be sad to see the ritual parts of the chocolate and the refinement process of the really good stuff fade away. What if we rebranded chocolate not as the easy-to-get-cheap-exploitative stuff and focused on the experience of chocolate - not exclusive, but more inclusive of the producers and with less supply of the predatory sorts?

Expand full comment
author

That's what some of the more sustainable brands are attempting. I wish this could come true. However, it's hard to compete against Nestlé.

Expand full comment

I boycotted Nestle ages ago when they started drawing up water from my university town and reselling it at a premium, despite the excellent water quality (ironically coming from those springs) in that town.

I think many folks don't think they have the power to vote with their wallets, and that's really a social failing in terms of teaching folks how to feel empowered against big brands like that.

Expand full comment
author

I use Nestlé as an example of a large multinational. And yes, people don't realize that boycotts work, eventually.

Expand full comment

Future plans: start a Substack on the orgs I boycotted and why :)

Expand full comment
author

I'd follow!

Expand full comment

That graph honestly shocked me! I knew beef was high but dark chocolate producing that much is disturbing and also great to know.

P.S. I love that photo of you! Great hat!

Expand full comment
author

I know, I was surprised when I first saw that chocolate was so high on the list. Chocolate is high because current methods of growing cacao causes lots of deforestation. Look for chocolate grown using agroforestry.

Thanks. I love my new hat!

Expand full comment